from mastodon @soutien812 (1st part, 2nd part)
Today we are witnessing the #PNAT requisitions. From the outset, Benjamin CHAMBRE declares that everything said on the stand is a story constructed by the defense to conceal the reality, which would be that of the #DGSI.
All evidence of the prosecution’s incoherence is swept aside, the lawyers designated as accomplices, the witnesses and supporters scorned, the journalists complacent. Never before have we seen such a rapid flow of lies.
We half-recognize the same rhetoric we hear from the far right: lawyers equated with their clients, the media disproportionately “left”, and the ultra-left a historical threat, going back 200 years to political violence in the world, to justify the alleged dangerousness of the #8december defendants.
He defines the terrorist threat: zadists, blackblocs, antifascists, anticapitalists, etc. It equates this threat with the ultra-right and jihadism.
PNAT’s political project is undoubtedly pre-fascist, and it’s up to everyone to confront it.
Strength to the defendants and their supporters.
Join the gathering this Friday at 11am in front of the Tribunal (Porte de Clichy).
Don’t let us be anti-terrorists!
*******
The second part of the #PNAT closing argument is recited by Déborah COHEN. She will rewrite the whole fiction to which the authorities cling, reusing ad infinitum all the snippets of conversation and words violently extorted by the #DGSI.
A story full of lies that are unbearable for loved ones. By pure strategy, she violently reaffirms F’s terrorist projects and the complicity of each person under investigation, making it possible to make the accusations stick, which would collapse without this supposed “leader” who recruited and trained his friends.
She meticulously denied all the arguments of the defense and disqualified a “collective defense as a whole” devoid of coherence.
This recital of unhealthy and deliberately erroneous imagination lasted 2 hours.
Sentences requested: registration with the #FIJAIT (terrorist offenders file), and 10-year ban on holding weapons.
L.: 2 years suspended sentence
M.: 3 years, including 2 years’ probation
C. 3 years, including 3 years’ probation
B. 3 years, including 3 years’ probation
W. 4 years, including 3-year suspended
S. 5 years, including 3-year suspended sentence
F. 6 years’ imprisonment with deferred committal order
Sentences out of touch with the real facts. And above all, the opening of the grail so eagerly awaited by the government: a conviction for militant terrorism.
THE DECEMBER 8th CASE. 