translated from iaata.info (8th oct.)
*photo of the gathering in Paris the 3rd of oct.*
At 6pm on Wednesday 18th at the Palais de Justice in Toulouse
The charges laid by the anti-terrorist prosecutor’s office (PNAT) cover refusal to hand over encryption codes for computer equipment during interrogation, possession of category C or B weapons (4 of which are undeclared), transport and possession of elements or substances used in the composition of explosives, manufacture of explosives and robbery as part of a group.
These facts would therefore all be linked to a terrorist enterprise, even though no plan of attack has been established after 2 years of investigation, but where the profile, supposed political affiliation and lifestyle of the protagonists would be sufficient to corroborate the idea of a terrorist project according to the white notes of the DGSI. At the end of the investigation, the case was not classified as a crime.
Thanks to the anti-terrorist tool, the State has free rein to exercise repression in its most complex and terrifying forms against those under investigation, while at the same time boasting that it is acting for the common good: surveillance, pressure, confinement, humiliation, isolation, control… with not inconsiderable consequences for all those who experience them.
Since then, Darmanin and the DGSI have claimed to have foiled “ultra-left” attacks in December 2020, when the movement against the “global security” law was gaining momentum. The anti-terrorist toolkit aims to silence all social protest, all questioning of the state, and the revolutionary ideas and practices have been on the front line for decades.
While the indiscriminate jihadist attacks of recent years around the world have been deeply shocking, we have seen states use anti-terrorism to reinforce the prevailing security discourse and legitimize authoritarianism, in France as elsewhere. And we see this discourse being reinforced in these troubled times, by designating numerous enemies (ultra-right, ultra-left, Islam, radical ecologists, rioters…) in a great catch-all that denies their political significance.
This anti-terrorist logic is applied in the same way in Russia or Belarus against anarchist, feminist or anti-war activists, but also against those fighting for emancipation and against authoritarianism in Spain, Chile, Burma, the Philippines, Italy, Turkey, the USA…
IN THE FACE OF THE ANTI-TERRORIST TOOL, LET’S NOT BE ATOMIZED. WE INVITE ALL THOSE WHO WISH TO JOIN TO VOICE OUR DETERMINATION AND RAGE AGAINST THIS SHITTY WORLD, AND OUR SOLIDARITY WITH THOSE ON TRIAL IN PARIS FROM OCTOBER 3 TO 27, 2023.